Perfume Review: Christian Dior Diorissimo

March 23, 2009 at 12:30 2 comments

w_diorissimo

Diorissimo EDT

Today I woke up with such a achy right hand that I wonder if I can use my pen at all. As if the Mondayness of the morning weren’t painful enough. If this were a diary instead of a blog, my entries over the next few days would be exceedingly curt.

To make myself feel better, I chose a white dress and red shoes to wear. White dresses always make me think of Diorissimo, so that became the next pick of the day.

It’s hard to believe that Diorissimo was first released in 1956, and then reformulated for the present. Far from smelling dated and old-auntish, it is wonderfully light and elegant. Its creator, Edmond Roudnitska, wanted a scent that bucked the trend of the cloying, foody perfumes that marked the day. He could not have chosen better than the tiny white bells of the lily of the valley. They were Christian Dior’s lucky flower.

The lily of the valley is often called muguet, but I have a liking for the Christian variant Our Lady’s Tears, which refer to the tears that Eve shed upon being evicted from the Garden of Eden. Ironically, the flower’s meaning is “You will find happiness”. Perhaps fittingly, the essence of the flower is notoriously difficult to extract. Best of all, the entire plant is actually highly poisonous.

Based on how the perfume smells, I would never have suspected the lethal nature of the plant. What I have is the eau de toilette, which was relatively difficult to find. A good friend found a 50ml bottle at, of all places, a Malaysian airport, for about S$80. Since then, I have only seen it in a tiny shop called Grand Parfums at Central Mall.

I believe that it’s supposed to smell like a good deep breath in a thick thatch of fresh muguet early on a spring morning. With one part of my mind I can imagine that very well. I can see thick drops of dew on vibrant green leaves, and delicate, snow-white bells nodding with the breeze. The scent is very much alive, floating on the air, absent on one whiff and strong on another, just the way it is with real flowers. With another part of my mind, I get the suggestion of ripe golden fruit, something that would juice and pulp upon biting down. Diorissimo doesn’t change much on my skin and is rather fleeting. It stays ladylike and looks up through downcast lashes – not entirely like me… but one can always have fun in pretending.

I wonder if I will ever get my hands on the parfum, which is supposed to be darker and more gorgeous than the EDT. I don’t suppose I will ever have the good fortune of experiencing the original formulations, containing the animalic ingredients banned from today’s potions.

Diorissimo has the following notes: greens, bergamot, lily of the valley, ylang ylang, rosewood, amaryllis, boronia, jasmine, sandalwood and civet.

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Reviews. Tags: .

Post-Photoshoot Pain… & Photographs The Girl Stabbed By Her Mum

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. The Manx’s Front Door « Home of the Manx  |  April 6, 2009 at 13:52

    […] Ditto for Christian Dior Diorissimo […]

    Reply
  • 2. sami Alam  |  March 31, 2010 at 23:48

    wow… just wondered to read your post…
    really love it….
    visit mine…& plz plz plz post your comments…
    hope you like it….
    Thank you….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Welcome to my blog!


My blog-name is Katie but I will not respond if you call me that in real life because it's not my real name. Yes, I do practise virtual-world paranoia. No, I do not enjoy stalkers. But I do enjoy writing and having folks reading said writing, so welcome to my world. It's nice to meet you.

Playing in my head over and over again argh

I'll Have To Say I Love You In A Song (Jim Croce)

Book(s) of the moment

Hogfather (Terry Pratchett)

Books read in 2010 and 2011

Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows (JK Rowling) - 'cos the movie's coming out!
Frankenstein: Lost Souls (Dean Koontz) - ah, bugger, it's part of a series! Now I hafta find all the books...
Dismantled (Jennifer McMahon) - oh, good one
Tigerlily's Orchids (Ruth Rendell)
Shutter Island (Dennis LeHane) - reminds me too much of work
Holy Fools (Joanne Harris) - it's official: I prefer her scary books
A Series of Unfortunate Events; The Unauthorized Autobiography; The Beatrice Letters (Lemony Snicket)
The Little Friend (Donna Tartt)
The main books - 11 so far - of the Southern Vampire series; the Aurora Teagarden series except for A Fool & His Honey - that makes it 7; Sweet & Deadly (Charlaine Harris)
The Woman in Black (Susan Hill)
Full Dark, No Stars (Stephen King)
Room: A Novel (Emma Donaghue)
Miss Peregrine's Home For Peculiar Children (Ransom Riggs)
The Bachman Books (Stephen King)
Men At Arms (Terry Pratchett)
Carpe Jugulum (Terry Pratchett)
The Fifth Elephant (Terry Pratchett)
Beauty (Robin McKinley)
The Sandman, Vol 1 (Neil Gaiman)
The Burden (Agatha Christie) - her crime novels are waaay better
Snuff (Terry Pratchett)

Visit my photoblog!

I started my first photoblog on 3 May, 2009. Each post features one picture, with a little story of how it came about. Do take a look by clicking on: Manx Pictures
March 2009
M T W T F S S
    Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Delicious Bookmarks

Archives

Don’t say I didn’t say this…

Disclaimers: 1) I cannot help but bitch about work sometimes, but everything here comes under the realm of personal remarks, and nothing here is said in my professional capacity. Nor does anything here reflect the opinion of the institutions that employ me. This is just me shooting off. 2) Most identities have been anonymized, particularly those of folks I know on a personal basis. Same goes for my workplaces. However, commercial and public places and figures remain named. Otherwise some things just wouldn't make sense. 3) Links and sources have been provided where appropriate and possible. They are not meant to challenge anyone's ownership. If this causes any discomfort or offence, please let me know.

Visited

  • 77,749 times since 10 March 2009. Thank you and I hope to see you again!

%d bloggers like this: